BBC HomeExplore the BBC
This page was last updated in January 2009We've left it here for reference.More information

25 May 2012
Accessibility help
Text only

BBC Homepage

Local BBC Sites

Neighbouring Sites

Related BBC Sites


Contact Us

Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

 

Tales Along The Thames

You are in: Berkshire > Places > Tales Along The Thames > A bridge too far?

The view from Whitchurch bridge

Crossing Whitchurch bridge

A bridge too far?

Local residents are protesting against a potential doubling of the Whitchurch bridge toll charge. But the company that owns it says the increase is necessary to pay for the bridge's reconstruction. See the full debate here and have your say below.

Doubling a toll from 20p to 40p to cross Whitchurch bridge may not sound bank-breaking, but local residents protesting against this planned tariff increase argue that daily users would be forking out nearly £300 a year.

Colin Cooper and Martin Salter

Not happy: Colin Cooper and MP Martin Salter

However, Geoff Weir, secretary of the Whitchurch Bridge Company, claims that the 20p extra is necessary to pay for the reconstruction of the Grade II listed bridge, which will cost £3.2 million.

He told BBC Berkshire: "We've put aside money over many years to reconstruct the bridge. What has caused this latest increase is the fact that the construction costs have risen quite sharply over the last five years."

Mr Weir says that approximately 6000 cars a day cross the bridge, and that the company takes about £280,000 a year in toll revenue.

But out of that rich sum he says that there a lot of overheads to pay.

"We've got to pay the staff, we've got to pay the manager, we've got to pay electricity utilities, we've got to maintain the bridge and the toll house."

Colin Cooper from local campaign group Toll Freeze doesn't buy that argument.

Whitchurch Bridge Company secretary Geoff Weir

Whitchurch Bridge Company secretary Geoff Weir

He says: "It (the toll) has gone up significantly supposedly to renew the bridge, and it does need renewing, but also because the toll bridge company want to make a significant amount more money out of this.

"Their dividends have gone up 60 per cent in the last three years, just at the time when they say they're short of money to rebuild the bridge. It makes no sense."

Reading West MP Martin Salter backs the local campaigners, and has joined forces with newly elected Henley-on-Thames MP John Howell. They've written a joint letter to the Secretary of State for Transport asking for a public inquiry.

"There are only two toll bridges left on the River Thames and in my view that's two too many," says the Reading MP.

"I can understand raising tolls for something new like a new bridge over the River Severn or a new section of the M6 to bypass Birmingham, but this is effectively a main road that unites two communities, it's been here for hundreds of years.

Mr Cooper also points out that amenities are either on the Whitchurch side or the Pangbourne side.

"Banks, GPs and the railway station are on the Pangbourne side while schools are on the Whitchurch side," he says.

Paying the toll

Paying the toll at Whitchurch

"A lot of people with young kids at school, they go across three or four times a day. That's getting on for a £1000 a year."

Both Mr Cooper and Mr Salter claim that levying a toll in today's world is "anachronistic".

Mr Salter says: "I would question why in this day and age we've still got toll bridges, they lead to traffic congestion, and they put an unecessary burden on a community that is effectively divided here."

However company boss Mr Weir says: "(Building) bridges were quite a challenge in those days, so a company was formed by act of parliament to build this bridge. The company is a private company which operates the bridge, and that's where we are now.

"It might seem anachronistic nowadays, but that's the way it is."

What do you think? Send us your comments using the text box below.

For a history of Whitchurch Bridge, click here:

last updated: 13/01/2009 at 14:16
created: 05/01/2009

Have Your Say

What are your views on the planned toll doubling? Let us know here. Please be aware that messages are moderated before appearing here.

The BBC reserves the right to edit comments submitted.

Chris Smyth
All private toll bridges should be abolished.

Mr Toad
Mr Weir seems to justify the tolls first to pay his own salary and other "overheads", and then admits it is an anachronism. So, really its just an anachronistic job creation scheme.

nick p
Peter,you make some valid points but the fact remains that the toll has only recently been increased by 100% and this new proposed rise in simply wrong. There is no guarentee from the owners to protect the local user discount,which could be removed at any time and indeed if you look at who the owners/shareholders are you will find very little connection to the village at all except a few "token" shares in the hands of locals. We were all told that the previous increase would cover the cost of re-building but now face the prospect of paying more to cross 150 yards of the Thames daily than we do to use the whole of the British road network !!!

Peter L
Will the tolls be reduced once enough cash has been raised?For those using the amenities either side, would walking not be cheaper and better for the environment and their own health? For those that live in Whitchurch it's only 100 yards to the doctor and 400 yards to the station from the bridge... For those that live in Pangbourne, we have perfectly good schools in the village, why travel to Whitchurch?After experiencing total closure, I would suspect residents will welcom reopening at any price...

You are in: Berkshire > Places > Tales Along The Thames > A bridge too far?

Your images of Berkshire

Find out how to send us your photos of Berkshire.

YOUR Berkshire photos in our gallery.

Tales Along The Thames

Tales Along The Thames

Explore our interactive map



About the BBC | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy