Gold coin of Kumaragupta I

Contributed by British Museum

Click on the image to zoom in. Copyright Trustees of the British Museum

Image 1 of 5

This coin was created to commemorate the Gupta horse-sacrifice or asvamedha. During this ritual a stallion was released to roam for a year. The royal court followed the wandering stallion and prevented him from mating. At the end of the year the sexually-frustrated horse was looked after by the royal women, before being sacrificed by the king using a golden dagger. King Kumaragupta I is said to have completed this ritual twice in his lifetime.

When did Hinduism first develop in India?

The Gupta Empire dominated the Indian subcontinent from about AD 320 to 550. During this period the old Vedic rituals like the asvamedha began to die out. They were replaced by a templebased religion that we would recognise today as Hinduism. As well as a belief in reincarnation, karma and the caste system, Hinduism saw the old Vedic gods merge with an array of popular and native gods. The goddess Sri-Lakshmi on this coin became the consort of the supreme Hindu god Vishnu.

For Indians today the Gupta period is a golden age, when the great epics the Mahabharata and Ramayana were written down

Deciphering a golden age

The rule of the Gupta kings was probably the most important period in the history of Ancient India, but by the early nineteenth century knowledge of this 'Golden Age' had almost disappeared there. Europeans working with Indian scholars gradually reconstructed India's ancient history, by collecting and translating ancient Sanskrit and Pali literature, deciphering the scripts used in ancient India and recording the monuments, antiquities and coins of the period. For the Gupta period gold coins like this one were the most numerous surviving records.

In the 1830s James Prinsep, a British civil servant based in Calcutta deciphered the ancient scripts and read the inscriptions on these coins. He was able to link them with inscriptions on stone to suggest a chronological context for the Gupta kings in the middle of the first millennium AD. Our present knowledge of the history of the Gupta kingdom is based on these and more recently discovered inscriptions and coins.

The coins are only representations of the kings, showing their regalia, costumes and religious affiliation and practice. The dominant religious images on the coins are the bird-man god Garuda, the mount of Vishnu, and Sri Lakhshmi, Vishnu's spouse.

Kumaragupta's coins are an exception, as they represent his name-god Kumara, more commonly called Karttikeya today. Alongside the cult of the gods, the representation of Horse Sacrifice on the coins of Samudragupta and Kumaragupta show a different form of religious practice, based on the Vedic tradition, which predates the cult of Vishnu and Kumara, a more recent development in Hinduism. The coins continue to be a vital source for our study of ancient Indian history.

Joe Cribb, Research keeper, British Museum

Creating a golden age

When colonial history began to be written, and then there was nationalist historic writing, there was a search for golden ages. Because in those days every culture, every civilisation had to have a golden age. And so the Gupta period was latched on to as that golden age because, for a variety of reasons, there was a change in the Hindu religion.

There was the beginnings of very remarkable Sanskrit literature; literature in Sanskrit, and there was an absolute efflorescence of art - Buddhist art as well as the beginning of the representation of Hindu deities. So this became the golden age, and also added to this was the fact that some of the Gupta kings fought against the Sakas – the Scythian rulers of western India in the northwest who were regarded as foreigners - and against the Huns who came from central Asia – again foreigners – so that tied in with nationalism. The fight is “against the foreigner��?, and the Guptas were the dynasty that stood up to the foreigners.

So all these factors came together in making the Guptas a kind of symbol of the golden age and of national revival. And then of course to crown it all it was said that the Guptas were the ones who patronised the new puranic Hinduism. And therefore gave strength to Hinduism because at this time it was a delicate balance between Hinduism and Buddhism and it wasn’t clear as to which of the two would become the dominant religion.

Romila Thapar, Indian historian

A focus of worship

There are very clear instructions given to kings in India in many scriptures, and they are all told to be very tolerant of religious peoples and intellectuals and - interestingly enough - people of no particular faith. They should all be tolerated and in that mood of tolerance people started to work together – traditions that already existed began to work together and some took off in a completely different way.

The number of deities is very interesting, you can count up to millions of different deities, but not all of them are considered to be divine in the sense of being the Godhead, that’s very few.

There are traditions that worship particularly Vishnu, and the manifestations of Vishnu which famously would be Krishna and Ram – I think Krishna would be the most popular deity in India. And then Shiva would come not too far behind, and Shiva and Parvati go together, and then Parvati in the form of Durga or Kali is also worshipped separately. So it is God manifest in many different ways.

The idea of the deity is the same as in any tradition, that you have a focus of worship. But it is important to fix our minds and not be eclectic. So you practice the presence of God in your life - by going to the temple where you see the image that is the presence, you bow down in front of the image, you offer food or incense, you say your prayers or you just enjoy the presence of God – in meditation, in chanting, people do yoga.

Shaunaka Rishi Das, Director of the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, University of Oxford

Comments are closed for this object


  • 1. At 19:57 on 1 June 2010, Rukmini wrote:

    Beatifull coins but the discription of the person on the peacock is called Kartikeya who is the second son of Shiva and Parvati.Kumara just means young boy.I've grown upi worshiping these deties and was very happy to hear the program and be lucky to see objects that are not always on public display. Thankyou

    Complain about this comment

  • 2. At 10:08 on 3 June 2010, K01 wrote:

    Disappointed with the incorrect information - it is not the Goddess Lakshmi on the coin, shown riding the peacock. I hope this error will be corrected.

    Complain about this comment

  • 3. At 13:01 on 3 June 2010, Joe Cribb wrote:

    It is good to see that these coins are providing enjoyment. These tiny objects , about the size of a ten pence piece, provide such rich imagery.
    Unfortunately the deities on Gupta coins do not have inscriptions identifying them, so the descriptions are formed through informed research, comparing the images with earlier Kushan representations which are labelled and later Hindu art, where images are better understood.
    In the period of the Guptas the Hindu deity now known as Karttikeya was more normally known as Kumara or as Skanda. In the earlier Kushan period he was called Skanda Kumara. There is evidence from the Kushan period that a god called Mahasena also shared aspects of the imagery of Karttikeya. During the Gupta period the cults of Skanda Kumara and Mahasena became assimilated into the cult of the god now called Karttikeya. The figure on the peacock is Skanda Kumara/ Karttikeya. The front shows the king Kumaragupta I offering fruit to the peacock.
    The image of Sri Lakshmi is not present on this coin. The other coin showing the Horse Sacrifice issued by Kumaragupta has a female deity on the back. Some scholars think this is Sri Lakshmi, but others think it is another aspect of Sri Lakshmi, called Rajya-Lakshmi, representing the role of Sri Lakshmi in king making. She stands on a lotus, one of Sri Lakshmi's symbols, but holds a fly whisk, a symbol of kingship. Before her is a spear tied with a ribbon, perhaps representing military victory.

    Joe Cribb
    British Museum

    Complain about this comment

  • 4. At 19:23 on 4 June 2010, K01 wrote:

    Thank you Joe for clarifying. The captions for the figures with the peacock need to be changed, because when you click on these images, it says the figure is Lakshmi.

    Complain about this comment

  • 5. At 17:37 on 7 June 2010, David Prudames wrote:

    Rukmini, K01 - thanks for pointing out the error in the captions. These have now been rectified.
    David Prudames, British Museum

    Complain about this comment

Most of the content on A History of the World is created by the contributors, who are the museums and members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the BBC or the British Museum. The BBC is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site’s House Rules please Flag This Object.

About this object

Click a button to explore other objects in the timeline


Made in North India


AD 415-450


View more objects from people in London.

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.